Rubrics

Timeline Rubric
 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Learning of Content || The student can accurately describe 75% (or more) of the events on the timeline without refering to it and can quickly determine which of two events occurred first. || The student can accurately describe 50% of the events on the timeline without refering to it and can quickly determine which of two events occurred first. || The student can describe any event on the timeline if allowed to refer to it and can determine which of two events occurred first. || The student cannot use the timeline effectively to describe events nor to compare events. ||
 * Software Learning || The student knows how to use the software and can accurately and clearly answer almost any question related to how to perform certain functions. || The student knows how to use the software and can accurately and clearly answer many questions related to how to perform certain functions. || The student knows how to use some parts of the software and can accurately and clearly answer a few questions related to how to perform certain functions. || The student does not appear to know how to use the software without assistance. ||
 * Readability || The overall appearance of the timeline is pleasing and easy to read. || The overall appearance of the timeline is somewhat pleasing and easy to read. || The timeline is relatively readable. || The timeline is difficult to read. ||
 * Preparation || The student had notes about all the events and dates s/he wished to include on the timeline before beginning to design the timeline. || The student had notes about almost all the events and dates s/he wished to include on the timeline before beginning to design the timeline. || The student had notes about most (~75%) of the events and dates s/he wished to include on the timeline before beginning to design the timeline. || The student had not prepared adequate notes before beginning to design the timeline. ||

Multimedia Project : Nat King Cole

 * CATEGORY || 4. Exceeds Expectations || 3. Meets Expectations || 2. Nearly Meets Expectations || 1. Below Expectations ||
 * Content || Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. || Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. || Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * Requirements || All requirements are met and exceeded. || All requirements are met. || One requirement was not completely met. || More than one requirement was not completely met. ||
 * Presentation || Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. || Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. || Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. || Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. ||
 * Originality || Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. || Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. || Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. || Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. ||
 * Oral Presentation || Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. || Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention. || Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time. || Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost. ||